Forest group's assessment of the environmental impact of the planned course of biotuote factory is closedForest Group's press release on 30.10.2014 at 9: 00 amCentral Finland, transport and the environment (ELY-Centre) has adopted its opinion, as designed by the biotuote factory in Forest group, the course of environmental impact assessment report. Assessment of the environmental effects of a contact centre for organising, and ELY-according to the assessment of the environmental impact assessment report meets the Act (468/1994) requirements. The contact point for the opinion of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) report was submitted to the 12, and one opinion. Biotuote plant project environmental impact assessment process launched in the spring, and the connection to the opinion of the authority, after the process is finished now. The results of the assessment of the environmental effects of the project will be taken into account in the planning and decision making. The environmental impact assessment (EIA) report looked at the environmental impact of the different options for implementation of the biotuote mill project in further planning and decision-making purposes. The project examined the options were the following:• Option 1: Build the new biotuote factory, which has a capacity of 1.3 million tonnes of pulp per year. In addition, the pulp mill biotuote mill complex includes some of the following institutions: the Institute of bio-oil, bio-ethanol plant in mädättämö, a product of the gas plant and biochar facility.• Option 2: Building the pulp factory, which has a capacity of 1.3 million tons a year.• Option to 0: the current pulp mill works up to the end of its useful life.The key environmental impacts of each option, which has been estimated on the basis of the model was improved by, inter alia, the effects of the factory air quality and climate, landscape and the cultural environment, Earth and rock formations, water, transport, as well as human health, living conditions and comfort level. In addition, the report is individually assessed the environmental effects of the construction period. A contact point is sufficient, but the project had to be reviewed for further planning should consider the opinion expressed in the aspects that are, inter alia, the potential emissions of harmful compounds during the ruoppausten, the recommendation to open a trout rise through the doorway to the new Myllykoski Keiteleelle and noise control design.
翻訳されて、しばらくお待ちください..